Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 22:03:48 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 19:17:56, Uri Blass wrote: >I thought that the intention of the rule not to have advertisment is to prevent >having the same commercial advertisement repeat again and again because it is >boring. > >I cannot see a demage from the fact that posters get new information in this >forum. > >Unmfortunately you want to stop us from getting information by not allowing >posters to post new information. >I think that it is a good reason not to choose you as a moderator next time. Then you miss the entire premise of this forum. If you don't want to vote for me that is fine. What makes you think I would put myself through this again? >With moderators like you people are going to prefer to read a different forum. >There is no special need for this forum and it is possible to use other forums >for information. Then post elsewhere. If you don't seem to like it here, there is _nothing_ stopping you from reading and posting elsewhere. >I do not think that steve lose money because of Vasik's posts. >It is possible that Steve will have to close this message board but >I do not care about steve and it is possible to post in another forum if posting >in this message board costs too much to steve(for example the winboard forum). > >Uri If you do not care about Steve and the effort and cost put forth to enable this place, then leave. Frankly this is _exactly_ why this place has gone downhill. People like you fail to see what others do just so you can read and converse with people here. Please post elsewhere, as I believe you will be better served than coming here. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.