Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:17:56 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 17:30:34, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 12, 2006 at 16:43:40, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I even disagree about it. >> >>I see an advertisement as posting the same information again and again. >>posting information about future releases of rybka is IMHO not an advertisment. >> >>Uri > >So if I post one flyer on a street corner promoting a new band, but only post it >once that is not classified as an advertisement? > >He post was nothing more than polling potential/current customers on a >subscription based fee instead of a per release fee. > >That is ADVERTISING his program and purchasing strategies. Nothing more. > >Please don't be so obtuse... > >Peter I thought that the intention of the rule not to have advertisment is to prevent having the same commercial advertisement repeat again and again because it is boring. I cannot see a demage from the fact that posters get new information in this forum. Unmfortunately you want to stop us from getting information by not allowing posters to post new information. I think that it is a good reason not to choose you as a moderator next time. With moderators like you people are going to prefer to read a different forum. There is no special need for this forum and it is possible to use other forums for information. I do not think that steve lose money because of Vasik's posts. It is possible that Steve will have to close this message board but I do not care about steve and it is possible to post in another forum if posting in this message board costs too much to steve(for example the winboard forum). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.