Author: John Merlino
Date: 13:19:46 02/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2006 at 15:03:58, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 22, 2006 at 12:37:40, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On February 22, 2006 at 09:36:48, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>It was interesting to read the many comments on my _report_ [not novel or lyric] >>>about the clear win of FRITZ over RYBKA 13b in the CSS Online Masters. For the >>>first time one of the classic professionals brought to an abrupt halt the >>>overwhelming success of Rybka since Dec 2005. What is the situation? >>> >>>What does this show to the knowing expert? >> >>Nothing of course. What is intriguing is that you are constantly talking about >>being an expert in statistics, and yet write a long post now claiming >>significant results based on 4 games. >> >> Albert > > >I am an expert in stats, yes, and therefore I know that your question is already >cheating, because - - what "significant results" was I "claiming"? Please answer >exactly this question and dont go into another ramble. It just doent make sense >what you are writing here all the time. What you want is just discriminating or >scapegoating other people. But you will fail in my case since I'm also an expert >in sober thinking. To quote you: "The result of the CSS Online Masters, altough belittled by the many Rybka fans, proves without a doubt that Rybka isnt flying high over the clouds while all others must crawl deep in mole hills. Not at all." The "proves without a doubt" part is certainly not true, since it was a 4-game match. If you are an expert in statistics, then you know this. Even if Rybka is shown to be 200 points better than anybody else, a 3-1 loss is nothing to be shocked about, statistically speaking. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.