Author: Charles Wane
Date: 07:51:40 02/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2006 at 10:23:46, Charles Wane wrote: >On February 26, 2006 at 08:46:40, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On February 26, 2006 at 08:29:15, Charles Wane wrote: >> >>> Well a Sherry Windsor never attacked a person when she said Hiarcs Sucks and >>>was banned, so I don't understand, your banning seems selective. By the way I'm >>>sure you are aware that the term sucks is used in Everyday english in america. >> >>Well Charles, >> >>You obviously do not understand the meaning of destructive speech. >> >>Saying something sucks and providing no data to support it is a troll. Saying >>something sucks and providing data to back up your claim is something entirely >>different all together. So then if Sherry had said Hiarcs Sucks,and then offered six games to back up her assertion, I assume her post would then have remained? According to you then the crime was in not providing proof? I can't with the wildest imagination see anything even remotely violating the CCC charter in such a case. Just for fun I asked five of my friends did they consider sherry's statement rude or offensive, they actually thought I was crazy for even suggesting it was. And I'm certain that in any real life situation the comment would have passed without a remark or rebuke, and I am sure had the Programmer of Hiarcs heard the statement, although he would not like it, I don't think he would have taken it personally since , It was not meant personal or directed toward him, I'm sure he is mature enough to understand that people have rights to their opinions however imperfectly expressed. > Peter this is crazy, surely you are more intelligent then this? Are you telling >me that sherry was banned cause she had a negative opinion about a program but >did not back it up with facts??? You can't be serious here. You appear to be >saying that the term "sucks" in itself was not bad, but the fact that Sherry did >not provide proof. This is on a whole new level of adsurdity . I think half the >post here should be deleted if that's your criteria for banning people. No way >you can label "Hiarcs sucks" as a personal attack. I do believe people have a >Right to express a strong opinion, with or without proof. Sorry I just can't buy >this as a reason for you deleting Sherry's post. >A monkey could moderate better then that! > > >>Now Charles, can you please explain to me how exactly you picked that _exact_ >>instance to challenge me on when it happened months ago, and you registered 4 >>days ago? >> >>Thanks Sherry... >> >>Peter > > > You really have a Keen mind, so if I mention something that Rolf got banned for >then that makes me Rolf?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.