Author: Charles Wane
Date: 07:23:46 02/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2006 at 08:46:40, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 26, 2006 at 08:29:15, Charles Wane wrote: > >> Well a Sherry Windsor never attacked a person when she said Hiarcs Sucks and >>was banned, so I don't understand, your banning seems selective. By the way I'm >>sure you are aware that the term sucks is used in Everyday english in america. > >Well Charles, > >You obviously do not understand the meaning of destructive speech. > >Saying something sucks and providing no data to support it is a troll. Saying >something sucks and providing data to back up your claim is something entirely >different all together. Peter this is crazy, surely you are more intelligent then this? Are you telling me that sherry was banned cause she had a negative opinion about a program but did not back it up with facts??? You can't be serious here. You appear to be saying that the term "sucks" in itself was not bad, but the fact that Sherry did not provide proof. This is on a whole new level of adsurdity . I think half the post here should be deleted if that's your criteria for banning people. No way you can label "Hiarcs sucks" as a personal attack. I do believe people have a Right to express a strong opinion, with or without proof. Sorry I just can't buy this as a reason for you deleting Sherry's post. A monkey could moderate better then that! >Now Charles, can you please explain to me how exactly you picked that _exact_ >instance to challenge me on when it happened months ago, and you registered 4 >days ago? > >Thanks Sherry... > >Peter You really have a Keen mind, so if I mention something that Rolf got banned for then that makes me Rolf?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.