Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 07:36:25 02/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2006 at 10:23:46, Charles Wane wrote: > Peter this is crazy, surely you are more intelligent then this? Are you telling >me that sherry was banned cause she had a negative opinion about a program but >did not back it up with facts??? You can't be serious here. You appear to be >saying that the term "sucks" in itself was not bad, but the fact that Sherry did >not provide proof. This is on a whole new level of adsurdity . I think half the >post here should be deleted if that's your criteria for banning people. No way >you can label "Hiarcs sucks" as a personal attack. I do believe people have a >Right to express a strong opinion, with or without proof. Sorry I just can't buy >this as a reason for you deleting Sherry's post. >A monkey could moderate better then that! It was more than that. It was attacking others, mailing others, threatening others.. > You really have a Keen mind, so if I mention something that Rolf got banned for >then that makes me Rolf? Then please tell me how you knew about Shrerry's problem after just 4 days here? That incident happened MONTHS ago.. Don't tell me. I already know. The spam filters are set up, so have your say :) Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.