Author: Ryan B.
Date: 21:46:35 02/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2006 at 23:57:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 26, 2006 at 23:50:57, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On February 26, 2006 at 23:16:54, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>In the pgn of CCT I find no moves. >>> >>>Note that I read that fruit lost against zappa by that way but I did not read >>>about something strange in the game fruit-hiarcs in this forum. >>> >>>I also see no moves in zappa-fruit and I guess it cannot be correct because >>>zappa did play first move as white. >> >>Fruit also lost by forfeit to Hiarcs. >> >>[Event "ICC 50 3 u"] >>[Site "Internet Chess Club"] >>[Date "2006.02.26"] >>[Round "-"] >>[White "FruitCCT8"] >>[Black "Hiarcs8x"] >>[Result "0-1"] >>[ICCResult "Game set by TD"] >>[WhiteElo "2000"] >>[BlackElo "2812"] >>[Opening "QGD: Tartakower (Makagonov-Bondarevsky) system"] >>[ECO "D58"] >>[NIC "QO.10"] >>[Time "11:00:37"] >>[TimeControl "3000+3"] >> >>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 Be7 5. Bg5 h6 6. Bh4 O-O 7. e3 b6 8. Be2 >>Bb7 9. Rc1 Nbd7 10. cxd5 exd5 11. O-O c5 12. Qa4 a6 13. dxc5 bxc5 14. Rfd1 >>Bd6 15. Nxd5 Bxd5 {Game set by TD} 0-1 > >Thanks > >I wonder what is the reason in that time. >I guess it was again some external factor and not bug in the engine. > >It seems that fruit lost only one game not by some external factors like >interface and it was against spike when it was very unlucky > Not to discredit Spike because it deserved the win but the games played by Fruit on day 2 where with crippled search speed. I am still unsure if it was an interface issue or a cpu heat issue. I am embarrassed that I did not have a backup plan in place and I am sorry that I did not give the fans watching a good match vs Zappa or Hiarcs. Thanks, Ryan Benitez
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.