Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:36:19 03/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 02, 2006 at 02:14:56, Tony Werten wrote: >On March 01, 2006 at 16:05:06, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I am still using my old 12-bit history index <to><from> to index into these new >>values. I also still maintain one for white and one for black. I once tried a >>17 bit index <piece><to><from> but it offered no improvement to the basic >>history heuristic, but I have not tested that with this reduction stuff. >> >>Any ideas what others are doing here? I can think of several possibilities: >> >><piece><to> >> >><piece><from> >> >><to><from> (I am doing this now) >> >><piece><to><from> >> >>to name at least 4. First two seem too simplistic. Last one turns the history >>tables into pretty good sized arrays (2^17 for white, ditto for black). >> > >It does only once if you use this to index a second table which returns an index >only for actual legal moves. > Not sure I follow??? "actual legal moves"??? >Tony > >>Note that I am essentially factoring in wtm already since I have two separate >>sets of history tables for black and white.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.