Author: James Robertson
Date: 11:39:51 04/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 1999 at 13:51:32, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On April 24, 1999 at 02:33:03, James Robertson wrote: > >>On April 24, 1999 at 01:50:14, jose hernandez wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>not pretending to offend nobody but I just don*t understand how is it possible >>>that the next match with GM Yermolinsky will be played in a so slow machine. >>>that is stupid. that doesn*t make any favor to Hiarcs. so if all you want to >>>see is a hiarcs7 resign, then go ahead and let him run in a garbage G3 233 >>>machine. >>> >>>I insist the program shoud be played on a minimum K6 -2 450 mhz with 128 ram, >>>but the ideal configuration machine would be a Pentium III 550 MHZ with 256 ram, >>>then we could be able to see the program power in its best capacity amd really >>>know what top programs are able to do against human masters. For people who >>>have a minimum understanding about these facts, there is a big difference >>>between G3 233 and a PENTIUM III 550. A really big difference. I surely tell >>>you. >>> >>>Remember, GM Yermolinsky is not a beginner, he is really a true great master. >>>don*t tell me that the sponsor doesn*t have enough money to buy or leasing a >>>GOOD MACHINE, if this is the reason, CALL ME (506-224.7758) I will offer him >>>mine for nothing(PENTIUM III 550 MHZ, 512 RAM ). >>> >>>I only pretend that the match will be a FAIR MATCH between two strongs >>>opponents. >>> >>>Keep on mind the good play that rebel 10 made against GM Anand in a two >>>Tournaments games last year was run in a k6-2 450 MHZ. the first one was a >>>clear drawn. INCREDIBE for a chess programm against THE SECOND GREAT PLAYER IN >>>THE WORLD. The second one REBEL had big opportunities to win but ANAND answered >>>with a manifiscent move Be6 !! This move is not reached by any GrandMaster, I >>>think that many GM would have lost this game. It was without doubt an excellent >>>performance of the program. >>> >>> >>>I would like that this message will be read by the sponsor and so he will change >>>his mind and select a better machine. It*s the only way that Hiarcs 7 could >>>obtain credibility. >>> >>>HIARCS7 is a great program and has an excellent positional knowlege and a >>>incredible endgame. For me, the best program in the world up to now. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>thank you. >>> >>> >>> >>>ps: if the sponsor doesnt care about the machine configuration, I think Mark >>>Uniacke should. >> >>Are you sure this is an exact translation? >> >>James > >I'm sure that it isn't, but I'm also sure it's an improvement over the original. >:-) > >Dave :) I hope so. I guess it has to be.... not really any other option.... James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.