Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CRITIC about YERMOLINSKY - HIARCS7 match. ENGLISH VERSION look here!!

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 10:51:32 04/24/99

Go up one level in this thread


On April 24, 1999 at 02:33:03, James Robertson wrote:

>On April 24, 1999 at 01:50:14, jose hernandez wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>not pretending to offend nobody but I just don*t understand how is it possible
>>that the next match with GM Yermolinsky will be played in a so slow machine.
>>that is stupid.  that doesn*t make any favor to Hiarcs.  so if all you want to
>>see is a hiarcs7 resign, then go ahead and let him run in a garbage G3 233
>>machine.
>>
>>I insist the program shoud be played on a minimum K6 -2 450 mhz with 128 ram,
>>but the ideal configuration machine would be a Pentium III 550 MHZ with 256 ram,
>>then we could be able to see the program power in its best capacity amd really
>>know what top programs are able to do against human masters.  For people who
>>have a minimum understanding about these facts, there is a big difference
>>between G3 233 and a PENTIUM III 550. A really big difference. I surely tell
>>you.
>>
>>Remember, GM Yermolinsky is not a beginner, he is really a true great master.
>>don*t tell me that the sponsor doesn*t have enough money to buy or leasing a
>>GOOD MACHINE, if this is the reason, CALL ME (506-224.7758) I will offer him
>>mine for nothing(PENTIUM III 550 MHZ, 512 RAM ).
>>
>>I only pretend that the match will be a FAIR MATCH between two strongs
>>opponents.
>>
>>Keep on mind the good play that rebel 10 made against GM Anand in a two
>>Tournaments games last year was run in a k6-2 450 MHZ.  the first one was a
>>clear drawn. INCREDIBE for a chess programm against THE SECOND GREAT PLAYER IN
>>THE WORLD.  The second one REBEL had big opportunities to win but ANAND answered
>>with a manifiscent move Be6 !!  This move is not reached by any GrandMaster,  I
>>think that many GM would have lost this game.  It was without doubt an excellent
>>performance of the program.
>>
>>
>>I would like that this message will be read by the sponsor and so he will change
>>his mind and select a better machine.  It*s the only way that Hiarcs 7 could
>>obtain credibility.
>>
>>HIARCS7 is a great program and has an excellent positional knowlege and a
>>incredible endgame.  For me, the best program in the world up to now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>>ps:  if the sponsor doesnt care about the machine configuration, I think Mark
>>Uniacke should.
>
>Are you sure this is an exact translation?
>
>James

I'm sure that it isn't, but I'm also sure it's an improvement over the original.
:-)

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.