Author: James Robertson
Date: 23:33:03 04/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 1999 at 01:50:14, jose hernandez wrote: > > >not pretending to offend nobody but I just don*t understand how is it possible >that the next match with GM Yermolinsky will be played in a so slow machine. >that is stupid. that doesn*t make any favor to Hiarcs. so if all you want to >see is a hiarcs7 resign, then go ahead and let him run in a garbage G3 233 >machine. > >I insist the program shoud be played on a minimum K6 -2 450 mhz with 128 ram, >but the ideal configuration machine would be a Pentium III 550 MHZ with 256 ram, >then we could be able to see the program power in its best capacity amd really >know what top programs are able to do against human masters. For people who >have a minimum understanding about these facts, there is a big difference >between G3 233 and a PENTIUM III 550. A really big difference. I surely tell >you. > >Remember, GM Yermolinsky is not a beginner, he is really a true great master. >don*t tell me that the sponsor doesn*t have enough money to buy or leasing a >GOOD MACHINE, if this is the reason, CALL ME (506-224.7758) I will offer him >mine for nothing(PENTIUM III 550 MHZ, 512 RAM ). > >I only pretend that the match will be a FAIR MATCH between two strongs >opponents. > >Keep on mind the good play that rebel 10 made against GM Anand in a two >Tournaments games last year was run in a k6-2 450 MHZ. the first one was a >clear drawn. INCREDIBE for a chess programm against THE SECOND GREAT PLAYER IN >THE WORLD. The second one REBEL had big opportunities to win but ANAND answered >with a manifiscent move Be6 !! This move is not reached by any GrandMaster, I >think that many GM would have lost this game. It was without doubt an excellent >performance of the program. > > >I would like that this message will be read by the sponsor and so he will change >his mind and select a better machine. It*s the only way that Hiarcs 7 could >obtain credibility. > >HIARCS7 is a great program and has an excellent positional knowlege and a >incredible endgame. For me, the best program in the world up to now. > > > > > >thank you. > > > >ps: if the sponsor doesnt care about the machine configuration, I think Mark >Uniacke should. Are you sure this is an exact translation? James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.