Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A proposal: for a better CCC

Author: Micheal Cummings

Date: 07:34:35 05/07/99

Go up one level in this thread



On May 07, 1999 at 10:17:03, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>I had been thinking that having people vote by faxing in a copy of their
>driver's licence along with their votes wouldn't be that bad a scheme, but this
>adds work to ICD's plate, something which is not so hot.  It's not exactly a
>fraud-free solution either, though.  Still, it's better than having Don Dailey
>hunting down duplicate accounts until the end of time.

First This would be to time consuming for the people involved, I do not see a
point when if you set down a more detailed series of rules so everyone knows
exactly how far they can go.

This idea was ignored, and was not even tried out on paper. There are still
allot of open gaps for abuse on here, the naming of cheats. At the moment trust
in one moderator due to things that have gone on as of late is gone.

This place needs an over haul of rules, more defined, more set out strait. We
cannot let the judgement of one or more moderators to mess the whole place up.

The problem is why nothing changes is because the moderators have the system of
deleting posts that try to give advice to them. They take it as abuse and delete
it.

Yes this place will go on, but as for the quality of it, well that depends on
how many more good people get the shove from here by ceratin people.

either way I would not be suprised it this post goes, I think I am going for
number five here.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.