Author: blass uri
Date: 03:34:19 05/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 1999 at 05:48:51, Eran wrote: >On May 24, 1999 at 05:22:50, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On May 24, 1999 at 05:19:05, Eran wrote: >> >> >>>We know that Hiarcs and Rebel are the strongest positional playing programs >> >>I do not know it and it is not clear to me what is the strongest *positional* >>playing program. >> >>Uri > >Well. As far as I know, both Hiarcs and Rebel do not consume much hashtable >memory in one or two minutes comparing to what Fritz or Junior does. I think that if Ed finds a trick to do the same program with the same evaluation function only 5 times faster then if we use this logic Rebel will be a weaker positional player. In >addition, they contain a lot of knowledge and they know how and where to play >strong positional games against human. Moreover, making Hiarcs 7 strongest in >SSDF does not necessarily mean that Hiarcs 7 plays strongest against human. >However, I do not know for sure whether Hiarcs 7.32 play stronger than Rebel 10 >against human. I know for sure nothing because we have not enough data of games against humans. It is possible that one of the fast searchers like Nimzo or Junior is best against humans and it is possible also that another slow searcher like chesssmaster6000 is best against humans. I think that the commercial Junior is not best against humans but the reason is not the fact that it is a fast searcher. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.