Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Microsoft bashing? [was: Putting DB chip into something the size of ...]

Author: Bo Persson

Date: 14:05:13 05/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


On May 26, 1999 at 23:37:22, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On May 26, 1999 at 15:16:30, Bo Persson wrote:
>
>>On May 25, 1999 at 15:36:50, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>>I don't worry about IRQs. :)  Linux can handle one device per IRQ, or 10
>>>devices per IRQ with absolutely no problems.  So we _never_ have to disable
>>>something, or move jumpers, or anything else.  One day windows will be as
>>>good?  :)
>>>
>>>Bob
>>
>>Yeah, that happened last year!  :-)
>>
>>Windows 98 does IRQ sharing as well with proper PnP devices. I'm using such a
>>machine right now (with 2 devices using IRQ 10 and 3 devices at IRQ 11).
>>
>>
>>Bo Persson
>>bop@malmo.mail.telia.com
>
>
>that's part of the issue.  Linux doesn't depend on PnP stuff... it has done
>IRQ sharing since the PCI bus came out almost.
>
>Oh yes... I have a linux box that has been up for 513 days and counting. Got
>anything like that in windows? :)

No, not really...

Some time ago Microsoft released an updated clock driver for Windows 95. Seems
that the orginal driver just hangs if the computer is not rebooted for a couple
of months.

It took several years for anyone to notice...

>(this box is a campus news server and is heavily used also... not just sitting
>there doing nothing)


Bo Persson
bop@malmo.mail.telia.com



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.