Author: James Robertson
Date: 13:37:31 06/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 1999 at 16:29:39, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On June 14, 1999 at 16:17:28, James Robertson wrote: > >>On June 14, 1999 at 15:53:24, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>On June 14, 1999 at 15:42:26, James Robertson wrote: >>> >>>>On June 14, 1999 at 15:01:09, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 14, 1999 at 14:22:25, James Robertson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On June 14, 1999 at 12:18:31, jose hernandez wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>[Event "WCCC99"] >>>>>>>[Site "Paderborn"] >>>>>>>[Date "1999.06.14"] >>>>>>>[Round "1"] >>>>>>>[White "Hiarcs"] >>>>>>>[Black "ChessTiger"] >>>>>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 d5 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8. Re1 >>>>>>>Bg4 9. c3 f5 10. Qb3 O-O 11. Nbd2 Kh8 12. Qxb7 Rf6 13. Qb3 Rg6 14. Qc2 a6 15. b4 >>>>>>>Bd6 16. g3 Bh5 17. Be2 Rf6 18. Bb2 Qe8 19. a3 Re6 20. c4 Nxd2 21. Qxd2 Re4 22. >>>>>>>cxd5 Ne7 23. Ne5 Bxe2 24. Rxe2 Rxe2 25. Qxe2 Nxd5 26. Re1 f4 27. Bc1 fxg3 28. >>>>>>>fxg3 Kg8 29. Bd2 Nb6 30. Qg4 Qc8 31. Qg5 Qb7 32. Ng4 Qf3 33. Nh6+ Kh8 34. Nf5 >>>>>>>Bf8 35. Bf4 Nc4 36. Re7 Qd1+ 37. Kg2 h6 38. Qg6 Nd2 39. Bxd2 Qxd2+ 40. Kh3 Qg5 >>>>>>>41. Qxg5 hxg5 42. Rxc7 g6 43. Ne7 Kg7 44. Nd5+ Kh8 45. Kg4 Bg7 46. Kxg5 Bxd4 47. >>>>>>>Nf6 Bxf6+ 48. Kxf6 Rd8 49. Kxg6 Rd6+ 50. Kf7 Kh7 51. g4 Rg6 52. Rc5 Rg7+ 53. Kf6 >>>>>>>Rg6+ 54. Kf5 Rh6 55. h4 Kg7 56. Rc7+ Kg8 57. h5 Rd6 1-0 >>>>>> >>>>>>This is really an impressive game. Hiarcs got the gambit pawn _and_ the kingside >>>>>>attack. :) >>>>>> >>>>>>James >>>>> >>>>>How many times have I seen this happen in a gambit variation between two >>>>>computers? As soon as the one down the pawn goes out of book, it doesn't know >>>>>what to do. No doubt there was not a preprogrammed response to 14.Qc2. Black >>>>>should play 14...Bd6 so that the kingside attack is on. Maybe CT was scared off >>>>>by 15.g3 or something. >>>>> >>>>>Dave >>>> >>>>I know.... CT had a lot of potential early on, but when Hiarcs forced it to >>>>trade everything on e2, CT was _way_ more than a pawn down. >>>> >>>>14. ... a6 just seems to make a very nice target for white. >>>> >>>>James >>> >>>Yeah, a null-move would have been better than ...a6. :-) >>> >>>In case it wasn't clear from my above commentary, 15.g3 would be the kind of >>>move that Black wants to provoke. (In other words, I'm not sure if my sarcasm >>>showed through or not. ;-) >>> >>>Dave >> >>With computers you never can tell. For all CT knew, Hiarcs would be >>discombobulated by 14. ... a6. :) > ><grin> I can tell, even if the computers can't! > >>James > >Dave Just think! If Black had won, 14. ... a6!! would be called "Positional Genius!!" :) James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.