Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 16:08:23 06/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 1999 at 16:37:31, James Robertson wrote: >On June 14, 1999 at 16:29:39, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On June 14, 1999 at 16:17:28, James Robertson wrote: >> >>>On June 14, 1999 at 15:53:24, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>> >>>>On June 14, 1999 at 15:42:26, James Robertson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 14, 1999 at 15:01:09, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On June 14, 1999 at 14:22:25, James Robertson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On June 14, 1999 at 12:18:31, jose hernandez wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>[Event "WCCC99"] >>>>>>>>[Site "Paderborn"] >>>>>>>>[Date "1999.06.14"] >>>>>>>>[Round "1"] >>>>>>>>[White "Hiarcs"] >>>>>>>>[Black "ChessTiger"] >>>>>>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 d5 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8. Re1 >>>>>>>>Bg4 9. c3 f5 10. Qb3 O-O 11. Nbd2 Kh8 12. Qxb7 Rf6 13. Qb3 Rg6 14. Qc2 a6 15. b4 >>>>>>>>Bd6 16. g3 Bh5 17. Be2 Rf6 18. Bb2 Qe8 19. a3 Re6 20. c4 Nxd2 21. Qxd2 Re4 22. >>>>>>>>cxd5 Ne7 23. Ne5 Bxe2 24. Rxe2 Rxe2 25. Qxe2 Nxd5 26. Re1 f4 27. Bc1 fxg3 28. >>>>>>>>fxg3 Kg8 29. Bd2 Nb6 30. Qg4 Qc8 31. Qg5 Qb7 32. Ng4 Qf3 33. Nh6+ Kh8 34. Nf5 >>>>>>>>Bf8 35. Bf4 Nc4 36. Re7 Qd1+ 37. Kg2 h6 38. Qg6 Nd2 39. Bxd2 Qxd2+ 40. Kh3 Qg5 >>>>>>>>41. Qxg5 hxg5 42. Rxc7 g6 43. Ne7 Kg7 44. Nd5+ Kh8 45. Kg4 Bg7 46. Kxg5 Bxd4 47. >>>>>>>>Nf6 Bxf6+ 48. Kxf6 Rd8 49. Kxg6 Rd6+ 50. Kf7 Kh7 51. g4 Rg6 52. Rc5 Rg7+ 53. Kf6 >>>>>>>>Rg6+ 54. Kf5 Rh6 55. h4 Kg7 56. Rc7+ Kg8 57. h5 Rd6 1-0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This is really an impressive game. Hiarcs got the gambit pawn _and_ the kingside >>>>>>>attack. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>James >>>>>> >>>>>>How many times have I seen this happen in a gambit variation between two >>>>>>computers? As soon as the one down the pawn goes out of book, it doesn't know >>>>>>what to do. No doubt there was not a preprogrammed response to 14.Qc2. Black >>>>>>should play 14...Bd6 so that the kingside attack is on. Maybe CT was scared off >>>>>>by 15.g3 or something. >>>>>> >>>>>>Dave >>>>> >>>>>I know.... CT had a lot of potential early on, but when Hiarcs forced it to >>>>>trade everything on e2, CT was _way_ more than a pawn down. >>>>> >>>>>14. ... a6 just seems to make a very nice target for white. >>>>> >>>>>James >>>> >>>>Yeah, a null-move would have been better than ...a6. :-) >>>> >>>>In case it wasn't clear from my above commentary, 15.g3 would be the kind of >>>>move that Black wants to provoke. (In other words, I'm not sure if my sarcasm >>>>showed through or not. ;-) >>>> >>>>Dave >>> >>>With computers you never can tell. For all CT knew, Hiarcs would be >>>discombobulated by 14. ... a6. :) >> >><grin> I can tell, even if the computers can't! >> >>>James >> >>Dave > >Just think! If Black had won, 14. ... a6!! would be called "Positional Genius!!" > >:) >James No, it still would have sucked. ;) Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.