Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999

Author: Will Singleton

Date: 10:50:16 06/25/99

Go up one level in this thread

On June 25, 1999 at 13:09:04, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote:

>I thought a fictitious Harvard Cup would involve picking which humans &
>computer's would be in it, basing it on the setup that was traditionally used in
>past Harvard cup events.
>
>My picks would be,
>
>Human's:                             Playing programs:
>
>1. Benjamin                          1.Shredder (of course)
>
>2. Rohde                             2.Fritz5
>
>3. Christiansen                      3.Hiarcs7.32
>
>4. Yermolinsky                       4.Nimzo99 (or 2000)
>
>5. Fedorowicz                        5.CM6000 (of of course)
>
>6. Gulko                             6.CS Tal II for Windows (A real wild card)
>
>
>mrslug - the chess software addict!
>
>
>

Re your choice of CSTal, my results indicate it's about as strong as my program,
perhaps a bit stronger.  This is from ICC blitz play.  What indication do you
have that it belongs anywhere near the top programs?

Will

• Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999 : Would CSTAL belong? greg moller 12:20:30 06/25/99
  • Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999 : Would CSTAL belong? Will Singleton 12:39:39 06/25/99
    • Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999 : Would CSTAL belong? pete 14:31:39 06/25/99
    • Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999 : Would CSTAL belong? greg moller 13:15:06 06/25/99
    • Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999 : Would CSTAL belong? Dann Corbit 12:56:24 06/25/99
• Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999 Leon Stancliff 11:38:32 06/25/99
  • Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999 Lawrence S. Tamarkin 14:20:52 06/25/99
  • Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999 Raul Kukk 12:36:53 06/25/99

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.