Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What is the difference between a Celeron and a PIII, chesswise?

Author: Robin Smith

Date: 13:56:01 07/02/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 02, 1999 at 16:00:53, Derek Bays wrote:

>On July 01, 1999 at 19:34:30, Robin Smith wrote:
>
>>A Celeron running at both the same processor and memory bus speeds should be
>>about the same for chess as a P III at the same clock speed.  For small, fast
>>programs like Fritz the Celeron even has a slight edge due to it's full speed
>>cache.
>>
>>A really good, fairly inexpensive chess computer can be made by taking a 300A
>>Celeron and over-clocking to the equivalent of 450 Mhz.  I have successfully
>>built 3 such machines and every one over-clocked just fine.
>>
>>For slow search, large knowledge programs the bigger cache size of the AMD
>>processor is probably the best.
>
>
>Hello Mr. Smith, What type of motherboard were you using with your Celerons?
>I am ordering an ASUS P2-99B and I will attempt to overclock my 366A to
>400+ MHZ any suggestions as to mainboards or settings?
>
>Thanks in advance, -Derek

I used both Abit BM6 and Abit BH6.  Both are designed with over-clockers in
mind.  ASUS also has good motherboards, but I have not used them.  Ironically
the 300A has better results as an overclocker if you want to get to a 100MHz FSB
speed because you can't change the internal multiplier on Celerons and the 300A
is only 4.5X.  The 366A, at 5.5X clock multiplier, could never get to 100MHz FSB
speed (it would have to run internally at 550MHz!).



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.