Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: more of this stuff

Author: allan johnson

Date: 18:14:42 07/12/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 12, 1999 at 19:30:47, Will Singleton wrote:

>
>On July 12, 1999 at 06:56:23, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On July 12, 1999 at 04:15:29, Will Singleton wrote:
>>
>>>I think that any post with a subject containing three exclamation marks, as well
>>>as the word "look" employed in an imploring tone, should be immediately canned.
>>>
>>>This is not to be taken as a criticism of the poster, but rather a comment
>>>regarding moderation techniques. ;)
>>>
>>>Will
>>
>>I think we won't get a majority for that....
>
>That's for sure, but I didn't really expect agreement.  My sentiment was one of
>those late night things, you know, like, here's just more junk from that guy, I
>wish it wasn't there.  But, what can you do?  In an open forum like this,
>without real controls, it's next to impossible to do much.  So the suggestion
>was admittedly a bit off.
>
>What some people don't realize is that my position isn't intended to produce a
>more restrictive environment, rather the opposite.  Perhaps the days are gone
>when people could gather on the net to discuss serious issues in a grad school
>type atmosphere.  Maybe that never really existed, personalities being what they
>are.  But the idea is to provide a reasonable atmosphere, and the quality
>discussion will follow, and grow.  I don't even care much if it's confined to
>computer chess or not; I'd rather have good discussions on the qualities of
>golf-ball dimples than bad discussions on computer chess.  And yes, someone then
>has to decide what's good and what isn't.

    Will: Everyone has their own opinion as to what's good and what isn't
good.We are all entitled to disagree but imposing a view of good on someone
or not allowing a person to express that view  sounds pretty dangerous to me
Judgements about value must be made
 Of course;and they are by everyone in society.The thing is our judgments of
values are often different.That's what makes life so enjoyable for many people
values often  What a terrible thing.
>
>Anyway, I'm done.  Sorry, no point, really.  Although I used to think that was
>the point (not the main point, of course) of this place.
>
>Will



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.