Author: Will Singleton
Date: 18:42:56 07/24/99
Latest results for the TSCP nps test: Platform Compiler nps Dann's build P3/500 msvc opt 63,246 x K6-2/400 msvc opt 57,163 x Cel/450 msvc opt 56,075 K6-3/450 msvc opt 53,634 x P2/450 msvc opt 49,338 x K6-2/350 msvc opt 45,679 x Mac G3/300 CW 3.1 opt 40,519 P2/300 msvc opt 38,223 x K6-2/266 msvc opt 38,159 K6-2/400 cygwin opt 37,516 K6-2/350 borland opt 32,638 K6-2/350 symantec opt 32,168 P2/300 gcc opt 29,205 K6-2/400 msvc no opt 28,745 Cyrix 300 msvc opt 25,345 x K6-2/400 cygwin no opt 23,885 P6/200 msvc opt 23,581 x Cyrix 200 msvc opt 20,398 x K5/116 gcc -0 17,200 P6/200 watcom opt 16,018 Note that the fast K6-2/400 result looks a bit out of place. Perhaps a mistake? The other result that jumps out is that the Mac G3/300 is NOT faster than comparable or higher mhz machines when those machines run the MSVC compiled version. Is the MSVC compiler really that much better than any other? Will
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.