Author: Steven Schwartz
Date: 11:04:57 07/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 1999 at 14:00:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 24, 1999 at 15:47:10, Fernando Villegas wrote: >[snip] >>I have no problems with that, I said in my very first post I was going to stay >>here, but when some guy insist in depict my behaviour as someting dirty, a trick >>to create problems, etc. then you cannot just cross your arms. Anyway, thanks >>for yor love. I need it. :-) > >That is the angle that I was attacking. I think when we start to draw >aspersions upon an individual's character, and run away from the argument >itself, then we are acting like little, petulant children. If we have an issue, >we should debate the issue and not try to psychoanalyze the original poster. We >are not qualified to perform that sort of analysis and no one who is qualified >to do so would try do do so on the basis of a few posts to a message board. > >I think you have the right to defend yourself against personal attacks. But >continuing to insist that the post should stand is what I was arguing against. Please start the subject header with the word "Moderation:" when discussing moderation issues. If you are responding to an older post that does not have the word "Moderation:", please modify the the subject header to include it when responding. Thanks. - Steve (ICD/Your Move)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.