Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Cray Blitz - Ratings of the past false? Or are Current ones false ??

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:56:03 07/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 27, 1999 at 02:41:30, blass uri wrote:

>
>On July 26, 1999 at 19:23:01, John Wentworth wrote:
><snipped>
>>In my opinion, Cray Blitz running
>>on a Cray Supercomputer would still blow away any of the current programs
>>running on any PC today.
>
>I want to see games to see if Cray blitz of today is really better than parallel
>crafty of today.
>
>I am interested to see results of games at different time control.
>
>I guess that cray blitz has good chances at blitz but is going to lose at slower
>time control.
>
>Uri


It isn't going to lose.  Crafty on a quad xeon is doing about 700K nodes
per second.  Cray Blitz is doing 7M nodes per second.  That is 10X, which is
very hard to overcome.  Cray Blitz also has some evaluation things that I can
do with vector hardware cheaply, but which I can't do in normal scalar machines
because of the cost.

But even if knowledge was equal, 10x is murder, speed-wise.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.