Author: KarinsDad
Date: 06:23:42 09/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 1999 at 03:07:44, Bruce Moreland wrote: [snip] >> >>2) I think people here can understand that if a person posts "this should be >>deleted" and it isn't, that the moderators did not agree. However, if a >>moderator explained why that did not occur, even occasionally, then moderation >>threads about deletion would be starting up almost every week. I do not want to >>read that kind of stuff a lot and I doubt you do either. > >I don't read every post and I don't intend to. Some topics are uninteresting to >me and I will not necessarily read threads regarding those topics. So if >someone posts a complaint about a thread, they shouldn't expect that I'll read >it, and they shouldn't just assume that no response from a moderator means that >the moderators didn't agree with their complaint. Agreed. I was refering to posts where the subject is changed to "this should be deleted", but I was being unclear. I see virtually all of those. > >People can write whatever they want, but if someone wants attention from a >moderator, they should use moderator email, and they get bonus points for >including a URL to the post they are complaining about, if they are complaining >about a specific post. > >I read every moderator email, and if there has been no response from another >moderator I will respond within a few minutes after I read the mail, and I read >my mail way too much. So members can be assured that if they express a concern >in that manner, that it will not be swept under the carpet. > >bruce Agreed. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.