Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 23:30:06 09/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 1999 at 00:35:01, Mark Young wrote: >On September 08, 1999 at 20:24:58, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On September 08, 1999 at 19:38:01, Micheal Cummings wrote: >>[snip] >>>You are right. If a GM has a heart attack and is taken to hospital the match >>>would be a loss to him. Or a draw depending on how kind the other player is. >>> >>>Rebel just had a heart attack. If it is not up to playing with the big boys then >>>the offer should not have been made. >>> >>>I my opinion you either win, lose or draw. And stuff any outside happenings. >>> >>>It was a loss to Rebel for whatever reason. Which makes me sad cause I like the >>>program and want it to do well. >> >>I think what Ed is doing is sure to strengthen his program in a mighty way in >>the long run. Besides which, he is providing real data to the threadbare >>question "How strong are computers compared to humans at tournament time >>controls?" > >This is not what Ed is doing. He is answering the question "How strong is Rebel >compared to GM humans at tourament time controls." We don't even know how strong >this version of Rebel is compared to other programs. This is a huge leap of >logic to make such a statment. > >> >>In any event, those (Rebel/GM) matches are more interesting to me than the >>recent knockout WC at Las Vegas. I am glad that at least one program vendor had >>the moxie to give it a go. As Rebel is one of the top programs, and there is not great difference among the best programs, I think we can generalize. Another subject: I have been seeing you place analyses of a position with Hiarcs7.32 with details as moves, depth, time, evaluation, variant, for the whole analysis done by H7.32. How could I make that? Thanks, Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.