Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:18:58 09/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 1999 at 05:45:37, blass uri wrote: >I am not sure if thorsten's claim is correct. >tal lost against crafty16.15 5:2 in James walker's games inspite of better >hardware so I do not think it is a very good program at slow time control. > >I am interested to see if crafty16.15 can do better results(with the same >hardware advantage) against tal in blitz. > > >I see from walker's games that tal is not a good program(not only by counting >results but also by looking at the games) and the only question is if tal is >even worse at blitz. > >Uri Maybe cstal does not like crafty 16.15. It does not have those problems against hiarcs7.32 or nimzo2000, also strong programs like crafty, he ? :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.