Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 05:31:29 09/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 1999 at 08:18:58, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 09, 1999 at 05:45:37, blass uri wrote: > >>I am not sure if thorsten's claim is correct. >>tal lost against crafty16.15 5:2 in James walker's games inspite of better >>hardware so I do not think it is a very good program at slow time control. >> >>I am interested to see if crafty16.15 can do better results(with the same >>hardware advantage) against tal in blitz. >> >> >>I see from walker's games that tal is not a good program(not only by counting >>results but also by looking at the games) and the only question is if tal is >>even worse at blitz. >> >>Uri > >Maybe cstal does not like crafty 16.15. >It does not have those problems against hiarcs7.32 or nimzo2000, also >strong programs like crafty, he ? :-) Michael Tal had is own approach to chess. And what an approach... I know some- maybe not much - but I have met him in Sweden. Those people shall never die - and they won't...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.