Author: James T. Walker
Date: 11:42:12 09/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1999 at 11:59:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 17, 1999 at 11:52:19, ROBERT FLINT wrote: > >>es correct!! uri hit the nail on the head ! > >??? he hit nothing. >i explained to him how the book moves work. > > >> hiarcs played horrible moves in the >>ast game that hiarcs7.01 did not even consider!! > >which ones ? >be precise ! > > >> so once again i question there >>validity. > >please do. >but give more data. >i don't even know which move you talk about. > > >>i am not saying there is treachery afoot but maybe a corrupt hiarcs! > >i have 4 machines and can cross-proof this on other machines. so : >which moves is strange in your eyes ?? >Do you have hiarcs 7.32 ? > >it does not make much sense IMO to relate hiarcs7.1 with hiarcs 7.32. >there will be different engines. so they will play different. > > >>i see only a win for hiarcs in the game! > >??? >aha. > >if you see it you should be able to name it. >please do so that we can discuss. otherwise discussion makes not much sense. ********** This sounds very much like me asking you to produce your proof that CB auto232 is cheating doesn't it. But I guess in your case it's somehow different. Jim Walker ***********
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.