Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 01:27:30 09/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1999 at 14:42:12, James T. Walker wrote: >>if you see it you should be able to name it. >>please do so that we can discuss. otherwise discussion makes not much sense. >********** >This sounds very much like me asking you to produce your proof that CB auto232 >is cheating doesn't it. But I guess in your case it's somehow different. >Jim Walker >*********** I am not asking him for any proof. I am asking him for the moves he wants to discuss. not more. This is too much for you to understand. The cb autoplayer is not ok. i stay to this. if you want to "proof" it, whatever you understand under "proofing", buy yourself 2 pc's and a cable and try it out yourself. I have done so, as many others have done so too. And they all had experience because they had the normal autoplayers before.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.