Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 17:45:13 09/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 1999 at 19:22:23, Hristo wrote: >On September 18, 1999 at 15:12:42, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >>I agree with Mr.Hamstra. >> >>Inprise C++ is a bit slower but is the better overall developement system. > >one MAJOR problen I had with Borland(Inprise) is that it didn't support >32bit inline assembler, i.e. no EAX, ECX, .. etc unless you buy and install >Turbo Assember. In this case the compile times were slower than MSVC and >the generated code was still slower. I use BCB 4.x and TASM is back! You can inline assembly like in the old Turbo C days. Works perfectly. Source level debugging works even in assembly, stepping line by line through the code. >Overall development system usefulness is largelly dependent on the projects >I'm working on. RAD systems are great if I don't want to deal to closely >with the interface issues. However the compilers are the backbone of a >devlopment system, so I like to use the best compiler. > >regards. >hristo What I hear is VC produces the fastest code and is most widely used. If you want to do Windows BCB is easier to learn. It is all that Delphi is (which is quite something) but in stead of Pascal it uses C/C++. It compiles all C/C++ code without problem. The ease of Visual Basic and the power of C/C++. Experts seem to prefer VC, because although more difficult to learn, it gives you more control over details. Regards, Bas Hamstra.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.