Author: Chris Carson
Date: 10:33:57 09/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 1999 at 12:46:49, Mark Young wrote: >On September 19, 1999 at 12:24:52, Chris Carson wrote: > >>I agree, Dr. Hyatt was/is correct. :) > >I am close to agreeing if the Rebel results are typical for other programs as >well. The good news is Rebel's 2480 Results is not that bad. It means with in a >year we will have a 2500+ personal computer program. If we just relay on >hardware advances alone. > >On the other hand, I do have strong reason to suspect if Hiarcs 7.32 were run on >a amd 600 it would have performed 20 points better then Rebel. But that can be >found out after this data is in, and we can test Rebel 10.5 and see what it can >do. > >We are on a knifes edge here with are data. I want to see a rating well over >2500+, anything less and I will give the node to Bob Hyatt. > > >> >>Best Regards, >>Chris Carson We are on a knifes edge here and very close to GM strength with the fastest Intel single processor (perhaps multi processors on Intel or Compaq/Dec boxes). I think we are one ply from super strength programs (6x speed current Intel box, multi-processors may be there). Of course no matter how fast or strong the program/computer is (or how bad I score against it), I want a stronger chess playing system. :) Go figure. :) Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.