Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 11:46:40 09/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 1999 at 13:33:57, Chris Carson wrote: >On September 19, 1999 at 12:46:49, Mark Young wrote: > >>On September 19, 1999 at 12:24:52, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>I agree, Dr. Hyatt was/is correct. :) >> >>I am close to agreeing if the Rebel results are typical for other programs as >>well. The good news is Rebel's 2480 Results is not that bad. It means with in a >>year we will have a 2500+ personal computer program. If we just relay on >>hardware advances alone. >> >>On the other hand, I do have strong reason to suspect if Hiarcs 7.32 were run on >>a amd 600 it would have performed 20 points better then Rebel. But that can be >>found out after this data is in, and we can test Rebel 10.5 and see what it can >>do. >> >>We are on a knifes edge here with are data. I want to see a rating well over >>2500+, anything less and I will give the node to Bob Hyatt. >> >> >>> >>>Best Regards, >>>Chris Carson > >We are on a knifes edge here and very close to GM strength with the >fastest Intel single processor (perhaps multi processors on Intel or >Compaq/Dec boxes). I think we are one ply from super strength programs >(6x speed current Intel box, multi-processors may be there). Of course >no matter how fast or strong the program/computer is (or how bad I score >against it), I want a stronger chess playing system. :) Go figure. :) > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson I'll drink to that :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.