Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: forward pruning for underpromotions

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 00:12:18 09/21/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 20, 1999 at 19:36:26, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:

>On September 20, 1999 at 19:05:56, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>On September 20, 1999 at 16:15:46, James Robertson wrote:
>>
>>>My program only generates Queen and Knight promotions, as I have never seen a
>>>position where a Bishop/Rook promotion was any good.... I have run across a few
>>>nice Knight promotion positions, though.
>>
>>There are some positions where promoting to a Rook is the only winning move, as
>>a Queen promotion would stalemate, and a Knight wouldn't be enough to be able to
>>mate the opponent with.  Unfortunately, I don't have any examples. :(
>>In any case, such positions are VERY rare.
>>
>>Jeremiah
>
>Here there are some examples:
>8/1P6/k7/8/1K6/8/8/8 w
>8/k1P5/2K5/8/8/8/8/8 w
>José.
>
>P.S. The Saavedra position is more interesting, but I do not have it handy.

The following is the Saavedra position as I remember it. It could be this is not
the exact position, but the idea is the same. My understanding is the position
ocurred in a game, but was not played correctly:

8/8/1KP5/3r4/8/8/8/k7 w - - 0 0

1.c7 Rd6+ 2.Kb5 Rd5+ 3.Kb4 Rd4+ 4.Kc3 (or 4.Kb3 Rd3+ 5. Kc2 Rd4 transposes) Rd1
5.Kc2 Rd4 6.c8R! (6.c8Q? Rc4+!) Ra4 7.Kb3 wins.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.