Author: KarinsDad
Date: 08:05:32 09/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 1999 at 03:28:06, Ricardo Gibert wrote: [snip] >> >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> 8 | | | | | | | *K| | >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> 7 | *P| *P| | | R | *P| *P| | >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> 6 | | | | | | | | *P| >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> 5 | | | | *R| | | | | >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> 4 | | | | | | *B| | | >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> 3 | | | | | | | N | | >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> 2 | P | P | P | | R | P | P | K | >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> 1 | | | | *R| | | | | >> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >> a b c d e f g h >> >>Bxg3, fxg3 Rh5++ > > >Oh oh! The immediate Rh5++ improves, but we understand the point you want to >make. > Well, Fischer once missed a mate in one, so I guess I'm in good company (of course, only a putzer class C player like myself would put together an example like this, ha!). KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.