Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:03:52 09/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 1999 at 09:39:17, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On September 27, 1999 at 05:02:28, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On September 27, 1999 at 03:39:23, Micheal Cummings wrote: >> >>>Even though there are 4 programs ahead of it, but on much faster hardware. >>>CM6000 tops all other programs on the 200 MMX, So the current list is a bit crap >>>IMHO. Only 4 programs tested make the results look inflated and not accurate >>>list. >>> >>>We all know the limitations of the SSDF, but maybe their should be a different >>>list, cause it is not fair to only play 4 on that hardware and the rest get crap >>>hardware. >> >>The problem, and I think they are going to receive complains about this, is that >>the 4 programs tested on K6-450 ALL COME FROM CHESSBASE. >> >Hallo! > >We all know the reasons for the above. At first on the new hardware-level we >test high placed programs and new programs. A few hours ago, I sent to a programmer my own list, based on the SSDF scale: P200MMX Test SSDF Diff Tiger 11.75 32MB 2602 N732 128MB 2598 CM6K 128MB 2591 CM6K 16MB 2591 2577 14 F532 128MB 2590 H732 192MB 2584 2572 F532 46MB 2579 2575 4 N99a 128MB 2574 F503 46MB 2566 2566 0 N99a 46MB 2562 2567 -5 H701 63MB 2556 2570 -14 J5 128MB 2538 J5 46MB 2538 2549 -11 C166 128MB 2537 R9 60MB 2524 2525 -1 R10b 60MB 2524 C1615 128MB 2524 S3 128MB 2497 W2K 192MB 2494 M8 60MB 2492 2496 -4 G6 192 MB 2489 Average difference = -2 ________________________________________________ PIII-500 Test SSDF Diff F532 192MB 2674 2681 -7 N732 192MB 2666 H732 192MB 2657 2646 11 J5 192MB 2611 2626 -15 C16.18 192MB 2587 Average difference = 3.7 As you can see, so far on the PIII-500 I tested only CB programs too, and this for 2 reasons: - they are strong - they are easy to test with test sets It makes me laugh (sort of) to see these suspicions based on that. By the way, CB didn't send me any hardware either. Pity. :) Enrique >I guess that we have been even more >critizised if we had started with Genius2, Rebel7 and so on. Unfortunately we >don´t have the resources to manually play CM6000 and are forbidden to play a lot >of other interesting new programs. Of course all or most of the following >programs should have been included in the list if we were allowed to play with >them, Genius6, Zarkov, Wchess, Shredder3, CS-Tal and Rebel10. We hope to include >McPro and maybe Rebel-Century, Chess-Tiger and Shredder4 as soon as possible, >sorry I forgot another new CB-program Nimzo7.32. Of course also CM7000 if it >includes auto-playing. > >Regards Bertil SSDF > >>They say the next list is due for November. I think they could correct this huge >>diplomatic mistake by allowing other programs to use this hardware too. >> >>Of course, CM6000 looks like a good candidate. >> >>If they ask me, I can make a proposition for another good candidate... :) >> >> >> Christophe >> >> >>>I will take the result from the engines on 200MMX hardware, which makes CM6000 >>>number 1.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.