Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:14:16 09/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 1999 at 15:09:08, robert michelena wrote: >Regardless of how one feels on the issue, the fact remains that only chessbase >programs were chosen for the faster computer setup. No amount of "spinning" or >creative obfuscation can change that fact. > >If you have someone who is the legal profession, then they will agree with me >that as per Federal Rules of Evidence, circumstantial evidence may be probative >and therefore permitted as evidence ( Rule 401 of Federal Rule of Evidence ). > >The fact that the swedish meatball association failed to incorporate non >chessbase programs, and thus skewer the ratings ( to promote sales?? ) allows >reasonable people to infer certain conclusions. > >If you do not agree with those conclusions, that is well within your right. >However, don't begin to assail the veracity of those who point out the obvious. > >I wait with bated breath the response from the defenders of the unholy >conspiracy. Of those you listed, only Shredder was even possible (for the reasons stated -- taken together with C.T.'s message showing that Chess Tiger is *not* commercailly available except as an engine for Rebel.) In other words, you are shooting blanks.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.