Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:55:40 09/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 1999 at 10:17:11, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On September 30, 1999 at 02:43:32, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On September 29, 1999 at 19:43:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 29, 1999 at 19:21:08, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>> >>>>Doesn't Rebel not use null-move? >>>> >>>>Jeremiah >>> >>> >>>without the contraction: >>> >>> >>>"does not Rebel not use null-move?" >>> >>>Damned if I know, as I can't parse that. :) >>> >>>But I do get your point... :) >>> >>>Bob >> >>:) >>I originally intended to write something along the lines of "I don't think Rebel >>uses null-move." I figured a question would be better, since I wasn't sure, but >>I couldn't figure out how to phrase it correctly. :P >>I revise: "I think Rebel doesn't use null-move. True?" :)) >> >>Jeremiah > >Ed has said here in the past that he doesn't use null-move. > >I think this was distinct from "doesn't use the null-move in the same way as >e.g. Crafty does". > >Dave No idea. Hiarcs doesn't use null-move like I do, but it definitely suffers from problems with the "null-move observation" being used in some way. Ed has said he does some threat extensions... they probably use the "null move observation" as well.. in some fashion...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.