Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 16:29:17 10/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 1999 at 15:28:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: ... >>>No.. he makes a pass over the entire move list to pick the move with the >>>highest 'priority'. Then the next time he wants a move, he does this again. >>>One pass per move is the only way I can see to do it unless they are actually >>>sorted by priority first, which is a waste of cpu cycles... >> >>but he has only 7 level prioritis, or he said another thing? > >sure, but he generates moves in random order and attaches a 'priority' to each >one. You have to either (a) scan the entire list and pick the remaining move >with the highest priority or (b) know which priority you are looking for and >scan (on average) 1/2 of the list to find it, assuming there is a move with such >priority. > >still N^2 basically... no matter how you cut it... ok, first of all I was no counting ataching the prioritys, anyway he knows what he do. >>well, another question, is good to maintain 1 killer capture? I think yes... >>who maintains a killer capture? >> > > >nobody I know of... why? because we try captures _before_ killers anyway, >at least those that don't appear to instantly lose material. So by the time >we get to killers, the captures are already rejected. sure! I was not saying that. (killers moves->before others moves , killer capture->before others captures) >>me. >>(the prince of amy mizuno, sailor mercury.) me again.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.