Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 06:27:58 10/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 1999 at 08:04:01, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: >very good last 2 posts. >5% disagreement is no "clone" whatsoever. >5% disagreement in games _adjusted_ to is a whole lot. > >Sorry, but I think the effort in "cloning" programs is better spent somewhere >else. I'm wondering if one could somehow produce an Anti-Ferret this way, if analysis with asymmetric personalities were possible. CM could then evaluate all positions that would be reached by a move of his opponent by the opponent's personality. What would such a program do on the SSDF list if it had different settings for Chess Tiger, Nimzo, Rebel? You could counter it of course by developing anti-settings and letting your program use different styles. How would a program fare against human opposition if it had the personality of the master or grandmaster copied to predict what move he was likely to play? Maybe we should ask the Deep Blue team for I am sure they have tried that... I was thinking about singular extensions for example and the way Kasparov always tries to get his opponent into positions where there is only one difficult to find move that doesn't deteriorate the position. Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.