Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 07:56:41 11/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
Hi, Vincent, Why you always say piece square programs are worth nothing? Not that I use them, but I am still considering it. Because you can put much more knowledge in your program than in a ordinary endnode processor. You can build enormous expertsystem-like evals and still have a reasonable speed. Succes op het NK! Regards, Bas. On November 01, 1999 at 09:03:20, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 01, 1999 at 05:07:36, blass uri wrote: > >>On November 01, 1999 at 03:34:38, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 1999 at 03:00:04, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Isn't it amazing, the great Tiger far behind? :-) >>> >>>Chess Tiger is very unlucky in this tournament. It had great positions >>>against Nimzo, Diep and Insomniac, but failed to win them. >>> >>>Best regards, Jeroen Noomen >> >>I did not see a clear advantage for tiger in the games against diep and >>Insomniac > > >DIEP was desparate against Tigre short after book. Then lucky Tigre >allowed to exchange pieces. Then score got zero and the endgame tigre nearly >played f6?? at a point but lucky for tigre failed low in time and played >a much better move. > >I'm very impressed by the good preparing of Jeroen. I'm not impressed by >the Tigre engine. > >Piece Square tables in the way tigre uses it don't work anymore. > >It was having the fritz5.16 phenomena bigtime. Before exchanging queen >very happy. Then after it was exchanged suddenly seeing it was a more or >less drawn position. > >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.