Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:59:01 11/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 1999 at 01:03:31, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On November 27, 1999 at 22:17:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 27, 1999 at 19:00:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>On November 27, 1999 at 17:27:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On November 27, 1999 at 16:07:31, Amir Ban wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 27, 1999 at 09:21:09, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 27, 1999 at 03:56:28, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>I just got it. My congratulations to Christophe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Enrique >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Just remember that this is a very 'special case'. CT isn't available to >>>>>>anyone, so the other commercials can't start their auto232 marathons to >>>>>>discover the 'holes' is must have. I think it is a lot easier to reach >>>>>>#1 if no one can test against you... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Nothing special about this case. Every SSDF leader in the last three years got >>>>>there as a newly released program. >>>>> >>>>>Amir >>>> >>>> >>>>Actually you are probably 100% correct. The 'last released' is generally the >>>>best. >>> >>>In February '98, Fritz made it to the top of the SSDF list. From that moment >>>on, Mchess 8, Hiarcs 7 and 7.32, Junior 5 and Nimzo 99 and 7.32 came to life and >>>didn't reach the top. Being new and tuning is not enough. It takes more than >>>that, and Tiger has it. >>> >>>> Not that it really means a whole lot... be interesting to study some of >>>>the games to see how much the book helped, how much tuning helped, etc... >>>> >>>>The point of my comment is that until others can test against Tiger to see what >>>>it is doing, it will probably stay at the top. Once it is "out" everyone will >>>>catch on pretty quickly... >>> >>>Try... >>> >>>Enrique >> >> >>Wait until it starts playing on a server. I'll tell you what its weaknesses >>are... I can already tell you who knows nothing about king safety. Who doesn't >>know about outside passed pawns. Who doesn't know about pawn majorities. Who >>over-values passed pawns and makes mistakes as a result. I can tell you what I >>don't do very well either... >> >>All it takes is games... > > > >ahhhhh Bob, please tell us here, we would love to hear about the details ! > >Wayne Here I adopt the same philosophy as Hsu. Why should I tell anyone how to fix their program and make it stronger? (except for amateurs of course). :) If you are a decent chess player, you can play over games and discover these things yourself. Some are very obvious. Some aren't...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.