Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:27:27 12/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 1999 at 00:07:50, David Beauregard wrote: >Bob, sorry you are in the hospital recovering from surgery. Hope you are doing >well. I have noticed that since Talmoves have either drawn or won 15 0 games in >the last few days that you have a NO PLAY computers formula for standard play. >Talmoves plays anybody human or computers and wins or loses without a formula. >Why do you have such a formula? Chess is a game. Win or lose it is still a >game. Why limit competition with a formula. I don't understand what you are saying. Crafty will play any standard time control up to 60 60 vs a computer. Perhaps you are mis-reading the formula, but if you check crafty's history, you will find many standard timecontrol games vs computers... or did I misunderstand your question? My formula attempts to break the game into three classes: very fast, blitz, and standard. I don't want to play 2 12 blitz as that isn't really 'blitz'. but it will play the following: (1) bullet with increment; (2) blitz with time<=5 and inc <=3 (3) standard with time<=60 and inc<=60
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.