Author: David Beauregard
Date: 08:16:44 12/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 1999 at 10:27:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 02, 1999 at 00:07:50, David Beauregard wrote: > >>Bob, sorry you are in the hospital recovering from surgery. Hope you are doing >>well. I have noticed that since Talmoves have either drawn or won 15 0 games in >>the last few days that you have a NO PLAY computers formula for standard play. >>Talmoves plays anybody human or computers and wins or loses without a formula. >>Why do you have such a formula? Chess is a game. Win or lose it is still a >>game. Why limit competition with a formula. > > >I don't understand what you are saying. Crafty will play any standard time >control up to 60 60 vs a computer. Perhaps you are mis-reading the formula, >but if you check crafty's history, you will find many standard timecontrol >games vs computers... > >or did I misunderstand your question? > >My formula attempts to break the game into three classes: very fast, blitz, and >standard. I don't want to play 2 12 blitz as that isn't really 'blitz'. but >it will play the following: > >(1) bullet with increment; > >(2) blitz with time<=5 and inc <=3 > >(3) standard with time<=60 and inc<=60 BOB, SEE MY APOLOGY BELOW IN ANOTHER MESSAGE. I misread your formula because I thought that crafty and Talmoves played 15 0 previously and it must have been 15 with increments. Last night crafty beat me in Blitz and drew in standard. You do have a great program? Crafty always sees thru TAls sacs which others dont. Please accept my apology and I will get better learning complex formulas. Thanks and I hope your recovering well from the surgery. Dave Beauregard aka beauman aka Talmoves
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.