Author: Charles Unruh
Date: 22:02:14 12/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 1999 at 18:41:53, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On December 04, 1999 at 17:07:23, John Warfield wrote: > >>On December 04, 1999 at 16:40:02, Charles Unruh wrote: >> >>>How much does it take to show blind men that Comps are GM strength. A program >>>beats a GM, draws several more, then beats lithuanian national team, Draws a >>>40/2 with Anand and there are people here who want to make out that it's hardly >>>USCF master strength!!! >> >> >> I agree!! And this kind of thinking is coming from people who are soppose to >>be so smart??? One man holds this entire newsgroup hostage, if that man were to >>change his mind tommorow about the GM issue then the whole group would follow, >>mindless idiots. > >For every game you show me where the program beat the GM, I will show you >another one where an under 2300 beat the program. Go look at the Aegon games, >for instance. > >Signed: a blind man and mindless idiot. How many years and computer generations ago was Aegon? What you might want to show me is how many masters or Even IMs could draw ANAND in a 40/2, beat the lithuanian nat'l team, beat GM sherbakov, Draw 2593 Alexander Baburin, Be called a GM strength by Larry Kaufman, all in a matter of a few months. If you could find one, there isn't a soul alive that would say he was lucky as opposed to GM strength.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.