Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 02:18:40 12/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 1999 at 01:02:14, Charles Unruh wrote: >On December 04, 1999 at 18:41:53, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On December 04, 1999 at 17:07:23, John Warfield wrote: >> >>>On December 04, 1999 at 16:40:02, Charles Unruh wrote: >>> >>>>How much does it take to show blind men that Comps are GM strength. A program >>>>beats a GM, draws several more, then beats lithuanian national team, Draws a >>>>40/2 with Anand and there are people here who want to make out that it's hardly >>>>USCF master strength!!! >>> >>> >>> I agree!! And this kind of thinking is coming from people who are soppose to >>>be so smart??? One man holds this entire newsgroup hostage, if that man were to >>>change his mind tommorow about the GM issue then the whole group would follow, >>>mindless idiots. >> >>For every game you show me where the program beat the GM, I will show you >>another one where an under 2300 beat the program. Go look at the Aegon games, >>for instance. >> >>Signed: a blind man and mindless idiot. > > >How many years and computer generations ago was Aegon? What you might want to >show me is how many masters or Even IMs could draw ANAND in a 40/2, beat the >lithuanian nat'l team, beat GM sherbakov, Draw 2593 Alexander Baburin, Be called >a GM strength by Larry Kaufman, all in a matter of a few months. If you could >find one, there isn't a soul alive that would say he was lucky as opposed to GM >strength. Hi! Remember that Rebel have performed this good in match-play, so you can probably add 50-150 elo in tournament-play without increments. Strangely most commentators have simply "forgotten" all about this. Regards Bertil SSDF
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.