Author: Peter Hegger
Date: 12:14:08 12/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 1999 at 12:38:04, Chessfun wrote: >On December 05, 1999 at 07:15:51, Côme wrote: > >>On December 04, 1999 at 16:40:02, Charles Unruh wrote: >> >>>How much does it take to show blind men that Comps are GM strength. A program >>>beats a GM, draws several more, then beats lithuanian national team, Draws a >>>40/2 with Anand and there are people here who want to make out that it's hardly >>>USCF master strength!!! >> >> >>Hello, >>IMHO Sherbakov and Baburin have played like if they play against humans,it's not >>a good choice. >>All Chess Programs are good in open positions but in positional play the value >>of a programs is not more than 1600! >>Best Regards >>Alexandre Côme > >We all likely agree computers are worse positionally than tactically yet >thinking they are only 1600 positionally is a stretch. >Thanks. I think a fair ratio would be 2150 positionally and 2750 tactically. To say they are only 1600 positionally is absurd in my opinion. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.