Author: Côme
Date: 15:05:05 12/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 1999 at 15:14:08, Peter Hegger wrote: >On December 05, 1999 at 12:38:04, Chessfun wrote: > >>On December 05, 1999 at 07:15:51, Côme wrote: >> >>>On December 04, 1999 at 16:40:02, Charles Unruh wrote: >>> >>>>How much does it take to show blind men that Comps are GM strength. A program >>>>beats a GM, draws several more, then beats lithuanian national team, Draws a >>>>40/2 with Anand and there are people here who want to make out that it's hardly >>>>USCF master strength!!! >>> >>> >>>Hello, >>>IMHO Sherbakov and Baburin have played like if they play against humans,it's not >>>a good choice. >>>All Chess Programs are good in open positions but in positional play the value >>>of a programs is not more than 1600! >>>Best Regards >>>Alexandre Côme >> >>We all likely agree computers are worse positionally than tactically yet >>thinking they are only 1600 positionally is a stretch. >>Thanks. > >I think a fair ratio would be 2150 positionally and 2750 tactically. To say they >are only 1600 positionally is absurd in my opinion. >Peter Ok not 1600 but 1800. In some positions a 1800 player play stronger than a programs. Best Regards Alexandre Côme
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.