Author: Charles Unruh
Date: 07:12:49 12/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 1999 at 20:50:41, James Robertson wrote: >On December 06, 1999 at 10:18:00, Charles Unruh wrote: > >>On December 05, 1999 at 18:44:57, James Robertson wrote: >> >>>On December 04, 1999 at 16:40:02, Charles Unruh wrote: >>> >>>>How much does it take to show blind men that Comps are GM strength. A program >>>>beats a GM, draws several more, then beats lithuanian national team, Draws a >>>>40/2 with Anand and there are people here who want to make out that it's hardly >>>>USCF master strength!!! >>> >>>Rebel must be GM strength. How else could it lose to the Lithuanian National >>>team, lose to Anand, lose to Rohde, lose to Hofman, and lose to who knows who >>>else. >> >>Oh Kasparov lost to sokolov, that must mean he's no where near to 2830 right > > >You have it backwards. :)) Sokolov's win, even though he did win, does not mean >he is 2830. :)) Man you need a brain massage. The statement means Kasparov must not be 2830 because he lost to a bare 2600 by your reasoning. > >>> >>>If we just count Rebel's victories it is unquestionable super grandmaster. If we >>>count just its losses it is unquestionably 1500. Average them out, and you get >>>IM. >> >>It would be one thing if these victories where all spaced out. However for >>rebel to get it's wins all in a short period of time decreases the odds. If a >>Human were to draw ANAND > > >Rebel didn't draw Anand. Rebel lost 1.5-.5. Many humans will win one game and >then draw the next just to get the day off. They still won. :) Brain Massage Rebel drew Anand in a 40/2 game! Show me an IM who will draw ANAND in a 40/2 game you can't and he has played some and just by chance they didn't happen to get their lucky 1 in a 100 draw i wonder why? > > >>, beat the lithuanian nat'l team, Beat sherbakov, almost >>beat a 2593 Baburin, all in a few months > > >Get your calendar straight. Rebel-Anand was almost a year and a half ago. "All >in a few years" is more accurate. > > >>there is no way that you would be >>trying to make out that he wasn't GM strength. You can not find an IM in the >>world that could produce the same sort of results in the same period of time! >>Do you know Anand has not drawn a player that was only IM strength in years! > > >Excepting Rebel, which IMs has he played in the last few years? > > >>Further you can't totally judge a program by results. > > >You mean Rebel's performance is so bad you have to say the results aren't real >just to justify them? Hahaha i wish you would learn to read full statements, I invite all to read your post it just makes me think that the educational institutions you have attended are sorely lacking(i am trying to make a stretch and believe that you have attended school at some point. Forgive me if i'm wrong). > > >> Why you ask? Becasue the >>comp doesn't know who you are. An example of what i mean is this I have had >>several draws against Comps by 3 repetition. The comp takes the draw because >>the position is basically equal and it doesn't KNOW that i'm not a GM. A GM >>would break the rep, even if it was a slightly inferior move because he knows >>i'm only 2000 and he can beat me. It's not that the comp wouldn't destroy me if >>played an alternative move to the rep, yet this would lower the rating. >>> >>>This is true for ANYBODY. Don't blindly filter out the results you don't want to >>>see and claim that you have discovered something amazing. >> >> >>I wish you would stop blindly filtering out results you don't want to see and >as > > >I don't. Show me the results I have filtered out. I have only an IM performance >rating of 2485 for Rebel after about a dozen games. None are left out. > > >>for this line "and claim that you have discovered something amazing." I would >>imagine that their are a good number of psychiatrist in your local area you >>might want to meet with to discuss your ongoing confusion. > >I take it you have experience selecting such doctors? > >James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.