Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:23:22 12/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1999 at 14:32:23, Chris Carson wrote: >On December 14, 1999 at 14:23:50, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>You posted this a few days ago, and evidently ignored all the responses. >> >>The upshot is that the G4 is not that great. A fast Intel chip can stomp all >>over it. >> >>-Tom >> >>On December 14, 1999 at 13:47:58, ERIQ wrote: >> >>>I really don't think any other program has a chance not >>>even rebel-tiger. the combination of hardware and software is too strong. >>>but I'm sure those win box lovers would never give it a shot. >>> >>> sign, >>> Eriq > >Here is the specint95 for Mac (AMD and others also listed): >http://macspeedzone.com/4.0/WinvsMacSPECint.html > >Top Intel (listed) is PIII 7333 with specint95 is 35.7 about twice >the G4-400. See www.intel.com. From: http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu95/results/cpu95.html We have: CINT95 Rates Company System Result Baseline # CPU Disclosure Alpha Processor, UP2000 667 MHz 4MB Windows NT 288 288 1 HTML Text PS CFP95 Rates Company System Result Baseline # CPU Disclosure Alpha Processor, UP2000 667 MHz 4MB Windows NT 478 436 1 HTML Text PS So if we are allowed to discuss expensive single CPU machines, we can get some fairly impressive results.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.