Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:35:49 12/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 1999 at 00:13:55, Christophe Theron wrote:
>If somebody has played one, maybe he can tell you.
>
>
>
> Christophe
Firstival: ChessTiger is better in longer time controls.
At blitz i guess hiarcs is a little superior.
in 40/120 hiarcs has no chance against tiger.
there was a report in the german chess-magazine EUROPA-ROCHADE
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/rochade
where somebody has tested it out.
Machines were each amd k6/333 with 128MB RAM.
the games were outplayed with auto232 autoplayer-device.
15' per game.
ChessTigerBeta: Fritz6 22-18
: Junior5 26-14
: Hiarcs7.32 17-23
: Shredder4 18.5-21.5
again: the results against versus Hiarcs7.32 and Shredder4
on faster hardware and on 40/120 show that tiger overtakes
both shredder and hiarcs when you give it more time and good
hardware.
this does not say tiger is weak at blitz, since you can see
it is good enough to kill programs like fritz6 and junior5
and also others. but is shows that tiger can even better on
slower time-controls.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.