Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:45:21 12/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 1999 at 10:35:49, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 15, 1999 at 00:13:55, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>If somebody has played one, maybe he can tell you. >> >> >> >> Christophe > >Firstival: ChessTiger is better in longer time controls. >At blitz i guess hiarcs is a little superior. >in 40/120 hiarcs has no chance against tiger. > >there was a report in the german chess-magazine EUROPA-ROCHADE > >http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/rochade > >where somebody has tested it out. > >Machines were each amd k6/333 with 128MB RAM. >the games were outplayed with auto232 autoplayer-device. >15' per game. > >ChessTigerBeta: Fritz6 22-18 > : Junior5 26-14 > : Hiarcs7.32 17-23 > : Shredder4 18.5-21.5 > > >again: the results against versus Hiarcs7.32 and Shredder4 >on faster hardware and on 40/120 show that tiger overtakes >both shredder and hiarcs when you give it more time and good >hardware. > >this does not say tiger is weak at blitz, since you can see >it is good enough to kill programs like fritz6 and junior5 >and also others. but is shows that tiger can even better on >slower time-controls. During the beta testing of Tiger I have been playing tons of blitz games between Tiger and several other programs, including H732 and S4. Tiger won all the overnight sessions, but I didn't keep track of the scores because I was more interested in looking for bugs in auto232. And the hard disk of my P500 broke last night, so the games are lost forever. :(((((((((( Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.